Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Data and Network Science » Factors affecting the adoption of blended learning strategy

Journals

  • IJIEC (678)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (606)
  • CCL (460)
  • USCM (1087)
  • ESM (391)
  • AC (543)
  • JPM (215)
  • IJDS (802)
  • JFS (81)

IJDS Volumes

    • Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)
    • Volume 2 (12)
      • Issue 1 (3)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 4 (37)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (86)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (11)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 6 (163)
      • Issue 1 (30)
      • Issue 2 (33)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (60)
    • Volume 7 (200)
      • Issue 1 (53)
      • Issue 2 (46)
      • Issue 3 (46)
      • Issue 4 (55)
    • Volume 8 (243)
      • Issue 1 (60)
      • Issue 2 (61)
      • Issue 3 (60)
      • Issue 4 (62)
    • Volume 9 (26)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(156)
Jordan(154)
Vietnam(147)
Customer satisfaction(119)
Performance(108)
Supply chain(105)
Service quality(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(91)
SMEs(85)
Financial performance(81)
optimization(81)
Factor analysis(78)
Job satisfaction(78)
Trust(77)
Knowledge Management(76)
Genetic Algorithm(74)
TOPSIS(73)
Social media(72)
Organizational performance(71)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(52)
Endri Endri(44)
Muhammad Alshurideh(40)
Hotlan Siagian(36)
Jumadil Saputra(35)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Ahmad Makui(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Dmaithan Almajali(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Basrowi Basrowi(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(26)
Ali Harounabadi(26)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2149)
Indonesia(1208)
India(762)
Jordan(726)
Vietnam(489)
Malaysia(415)
Saudi Arabia(400)
United Arab Emirates(209)
Thailand(142)
China(130)
United States(100)
Turkey(97)
Ukraine(93)
Egypt(86)
Canada(83)
Pakistan(81)
Nigeria(72)
Peru(70)
United Kingdom(69)
Taiwan(65)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Data and Network Science

ISSN 2561-8156 (Online) - ISSN 2561-8148 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 5 Issue 3 pp. 267-274 , 2021

Factors affecting the adoption of blended learning strategy Pages 267-274 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Sura I. Al-Ayed, Ahmad Adnan Al-Tit

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.6.007

Keywords: E-Learning, Humans, Institutional, Blended Learning Strategy, Adoption, Business Education

Abstract: The aim of this study is to explore factors affecting the adoption of blended learning strategy. Data was collected using a questionnaire consisting of 42 items, distributed to a random sample of 174 faculty members of Saudi Electronic University and Qassim University. IBM SPSS was used to conduct data analysis. Supporting research hypothesis indicates that student, institutional and learning variables had significant influences on the adoption of blended learning strategy. Considering the findings, it was concluded that the adoption of a blended learning strategy depends not only on the technological aspect of the learning process but also on people, i.e., students who are engaged in the process and motivated teachers who possess the required knowledge and skills. The most important implication of this research is that policy and decision makers in business educational schools are requested to consider factors that had a significant effect on the adoption of blended learning. In doing that, the research contributes to the blended learning knowledge via highlighting the key variables that encourage or hinder the adoption of blended learning strategy.


How to cite this paper
Al-Ayed, S & Al-Tit, A. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of blended learning strategy.International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 267-274.

Refrences
Abdulrahman, A. (2016). The effect of blended learning strategy on Islamic scientific college students and the develop-ment of their jurisprudential concepts. Diyala Journal of Human Research, 69, 309-339.
Al lHassan, S., & Shukri, N. (2017). The effect of blended learning in enhancing Female students' satisfaction in the Saudi context. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 190-203.
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approach-es. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454.
Al-Ani, W. T. (2013). Blended learning approach using Moodle and student's achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 96-110.
Al-Awad, F., & Al-Yones, Y. (2011). The effect of using a blended teaching method on eighth grade students’ achieve-ment in functions and equations solving units. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 38(2), 2351-2368.
Al-Fuhaid, T. F. (2015). The current utilization of blended learning in the teaching of natural sciences in secondary schools: Perspectives of educational supervisors and teachers of sciences in Qassim region. A Master Thesis, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Ghamdi (2013). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of students at the second grade secondary in Arabic subject in Jeddah governorate and teachers attitudes toward it. A Master Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Alijani, G. S., Kwun, O., & Yu, Y. (2014). Effectiveness of blended learning in KIPP new Orleans’s schools. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(2), 125-141.
Al-Tit, A. A., Omri, A., & Hadj, T. B. (2020). The driving factors of the social commerce intention of Saudi Arabia’s online communities. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019899746
Al-Zu’bi, A., & Bani-Domi, H. (2012). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of the fourth graders' and their motivation towards learning. Damascus University Journal for Educational Sciences, 1, 485-518.
Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156-163.
Blieck, Y., Kauwenberghs, K., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., & DePryck, K. (2019). Investigating the relationship be-tween success factors and student participation in online and blended learning in adult education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 476-490.
Bonk, C.J., Kim, K., & Zeng, T. (2006). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In C.J. Bonk and C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1-10.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.
Delialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). Students' perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133-146.
Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.
Ellis, R. A., Steed, A. F., & Applebee, A. C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and asso-ciations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312-335.
Euchi, J., Omri, A., & Al-Tit, A. (2018). The pillars of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia. World Review of Sci-ence, Technology and Sustainable Development, 14(4), 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2018.095719
Fazal, M. and Bryant, M. (2019). Blended Learning in Middle School Math: The Question of Effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49-64.
Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
George-Walker, L. D., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning de-sign. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1-13.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14.
Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publi-cation trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381-413.
Harris, P., Connolly, J., & Feeney, L. (2009). Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implemen-tation. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 155-163.
Hwang, R. H., Lin, H. T., Sun, J. C. Y., & Wu, J. J. (2019). Improving Learning Achievement in Science Education for El-ementary School Students via Blended Learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 9(2), 44-62.
Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 47.
Larson, R. C., & Murray, M. E. (2008). Open educational resources for blended learning in high schools: Overcoming im-pediments in developing countries. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 85-103.
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282-293.
Makhdoom, N., Khoshhal, K., Algaidi, S., Heissam, K., & Zolaly, M. (2013). Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 8(1), 12-17.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
Mitchell, A. and Honore, S. (2007). Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3), 143-149.
Mohammed, G., Hasaballah, A., Almohaimmeed, B., & Al-Tit, A. (2017). The impact of product performance on brand loyalty mediated by customer satisfaction: Study in Sudanese service industry. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.01.017
Mozelius, P., & Hettiarachchi, E. (2017). Critical Factors for Implementing Blended Learning in Higher Educa-tion. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 6(1), 4-18.
Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38-46.
Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merí, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomás, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical education, 41(2), 189-195.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: an institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271-288.
Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748-762.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The internet and Higher education, 28, 17-27.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.
Rahman, M. S., Haque, M. M., & Hussain, B. (2012). Brand Image and its impact on Consumer's perception: Structural Equation Modelling Approach on Young Consumer's in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(8), 768-774.
Riyami, B., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2019). Contribution to the multidimensional analysis of the success factors of the integration of the ICTE in higher education in Morocco: Case of the MOOC' relational databases: understanding to master students' point of view. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 80-102.
Rossett, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. (2003). Strategies for building blended learning. Learning Circuits, 4(7), 1-8.
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-13.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Shevlin, M., & Adamson, G. (2005). Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: a large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 231–236.
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-, 43(6), 51-54.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blend-ed learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336.
Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2008). Success factors for blended learning. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educa-tional technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne. Avialbale at: http:// www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/stacey.pdf.
Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-learning, 6(1), 81-94.
Vodanovich, S. J., Wallace, J. C., & Kass, S. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(3), 295-303.
Wall, J., & Ahmed, V. (2008). Lessons learned from a case study in deploying blended learning continuing professional development. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2), 185-202.
Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–393.
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Data and Network Science | Year: 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Views: 3462 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Management of Academic Advising in Higher Educational Institutions during C ...
  • The effect of e-learning in developing high thinking skills
  • Explaining the impact of blended learning on relevant factors in west Tehra ...
  • An assessment on the quality of electronic educational courses versus tradi ...
  • Measuring the effects of electronic learning components using ANFIS method

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com