Decision making of maritime development scenario on the impact of naval base for supporting navy ships operations

Suharyo, O.; Prabowo, A.; Krisdiono, E.

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Decision making of maritime development scenario on the impact of naval base for supporting navy ships operations

Journals

DSL Volumes

Volume 1 (10)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (5)

Volume 2 (30)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (53)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 4 (48)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (12)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (12)

Volume 5 (39)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 6 (30)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 7 (41)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 8 (38)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 9 (39)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 10 (43)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (20)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 11 (49)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 12 (64)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (24)
- Issue 3 (13)
- Issue 4 (15)

Volume 13 (78)
- Issue 1 (21)
- Issue 2 (18)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (20)

Volume 14 (21)
- Issue 1 (21)

Countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 11 Issue 1 pp. 81-90 , 2022

Decision making of maritime development scenario on the impact of naval base for supporting navy ships operations Pages 81-90 Download PDF

Authors: Okol Sri Suharyo, Ayip Rivai Prabowo, Eko Krisdiono

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2021.8.002

Keywords: Maritime Development, Naval Base Carrying Capacity, System Dynamic

Abstract: The Indonesian Navy is the spearhead in maintaining maritime security in Indonesian waters. In carrying out its main tasks, the Indonesian Navy has components of an Integrated Fleet Weapon System in which there are elements of Ships and Naval Bases. To ensure the effectiveness of carrying out operations by ship elements, ship operations are supported by the Naval Base as the organizer of the support function. Naval Base's carrying capacity consists of 5 (five) support functions, including: (1) support for anchoring facilities; (2) support for supply facilities; (3) support for maintenance and repair facilities; (4) support facility maintenance personnel; and (5) support for base development facilities. Naval Base does not yet have its dock to support anchoring facilities for ship operations. In addition to cooperation in the use of the Naval Base anchorage facility, there is also cooperation in port security, both in terms of land and port water aspects. As the number of ship visits at Naval Base Harbor increases, the dock utility increases. The increase in dock utility resulted in a decrease in port services which also resulted in a decrease in the Naval Base Carrying Capacity. To improve port services, Pelindo III implements the port development program contained in the Naval Base Port Master Plan in Permen KP number 792 of 2017. In this study, an analysis of the impact of the Naval Base Port development policy on the carrying capacity of the Naval Base was carried out. The data analysis uses System Dynamics modeling with a simulation period of 30 years in 3 development scenarios, namely short-term scenarios, medium-term scenarios, and long-term scenarios. From the simulation results, it is found that the construction of the Naval Base port affects the Naval Base Carrying Capacity with an average increase of 1.8% in each policy scenario. The increase in Naval Base Carrying Capacity has an effect on increasing Ship Operations by an average of 1.8% and also increasing the Security of Naval Base Harbor by an average of 0.14%. The results of the analysis of this study can be used as consideration for policymaking by the Navy.

How to cite this paper

 Suharyo, O., Prabowo, A & Krisdiono, E. (2022). Decision making of maritime development scenario on the impact of naval base for supporting navy ships operations.Decision Science Letters , 11(1), 81-90.

Refrences

Ahmadi, A., & Herdiawan, D. (2021). The implementation of Borda and Promethee for decision making of naval base selection. Decision Science Letters, 10(2), 129-138.
Anwar, S. (2018). Membangun keamanan maritim Indonesia dalam analisa kepentingan, ancaman, dan kekuatan laut. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 6(3), 69-90.
Bachtiar, A., Marimin, M., Adrianto, L., & Bura, R. (2021). Determinants of shipbuilding industry competitive factors and institutional model analysis. Decision Science Letters, 10(2), 151-162.
Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 12(3), 183-210.
Britt, D. W. (2014). A conceptual introduction to modeling: Qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Psychology Press.
Buntoro, K. (2012). Alur laut kepulauan Indonesia (ALKI): prospek dan kendala. Sekolah Staf dan Komando TNI AL (Seskoal).
Buzan, B. (1983). People, States and Fear; The National Secutity Problem in International Relation. The University of North Carolina Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principle of System. Massachusetts: Wright.
Klein, N., Mossop, J., & Rothwell, D. R. (Eds.). (2009). Maritime security: international law and policy perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. Routledge.
Nugroho, S., Bandono, A., & Suharyo, O. (2021). Human resources development assessment planning program and bureaucratic reform management on the performance of government organization. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1429-1438.
Nugroho, S. H., Madhakomala, R., & Gunawan, K. (2019). The system dynamic model for policy evaluation of navy personnel on the state-duty aspect. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 228-236.
Priadi, A. A., & Tjahjono, T. (2015). Implementation of traffic separation scheme for preventing accidents on the Sunda Strait. International Journal of Technology, 6(6), 990-997.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for a complex world Irwin McGraw-Hill. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division: Cambridge, MA, USA.
Susilo, A. K., Ciptomulyono, U., Putra, I. N., Ahmadi, A., & Suharyo, O. S. (2019). Navy Ability Development Strategy using SWOT Analysis-Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM). Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 24(1).
Suharjo, B. (2019). Using System Dynamics to Analyze the Leadership Style on Motivation and Soldier’s Performance. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 125, p. 22002). EDP Sciences.
Suharyo, O. S., Manfaat, D., & Armono, H. D. (2017). Establishing the location of naval base using fuzzy MCDM and covering technique methods: A case study. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, IJOQM, 23(1), 61-87.
Sumantri, S. H., Bastari, A., & Sri Suharyo, O. (2019). The assessment of naval base sustainability using a dynamic system thinking approach. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 388-394.