There are pros and cons to the internal factors of the firm value. Some internal factors that play a role in firm value are company size, leverage, and profitability. The purpose of this study is to analyze the internal factors that influence the firm value. The research sample is all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017. The dependent variable in this study is the firm value, while the independent variables are firm size, leverage, and profitability. The method used is the data panel. The results show that leverage had a negative and significant effect on firm value. In contrast, profitability and company size had a positive but insignificant effect on firm value. The results are in line with the allegation that the larger the company's size, the higher the investor's confidence in the company's ability to provide a return on investment. This evidence is in line with the allegations in the hypothesis that company size has a positive effect on its value.

This study considers 77 Vietnam industry listed enterprises from 2012 to 2018 as research samples to establish indicators for evaluating the relationship between Enterprise risk management (ERM) and firm value among industry enterprises in Vietnam. International economic integration not only opens up many business opportunities for businesses but also brings many challenges for Vietnamese businesses. One of the challenges is that the financial risks to businesses are increasingly diverse in type and sophistication. Our results show that the implementation of ERM in the previous year has strong positive relationship with firm value. These findings support the recent pressure on businesses to adopt more comprehensive risk management systems.

The paper examines the impact of corporate governance (CG), capital structure (CS) on firm value (FV) of firms in Vietnam. The study used different regression methods using the data collected at enterprises listed on the stock market in Vietnam over the period 2008 - 2018, with 2937 observations. The research results find that the size of the Board of Directors, the independence of the Board of Directors, the percentage of women participating in the Board of Directors had a positive influence on FV. Besides, in the case of the Chairman of the Board of Directors controlling the CEO, the frequency of the Board meeting had a negative effect on FV. The study has determined that CS has nonlinear influence on FV, in addition, the research results also prove that firm size had positive relationship to FV. The empirical research results are a useful basis to help businesses improve FV, thereby helping businesses need to consider the elements of the Board of Directors in each enterprise, determine the appropriate capital structure.

This paper presents an empirical study on the effects of various factors on firm value including capital structure, firm size, asset growth, etc. The proposed study gathers the necessary information from selected firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange over the period 2006-2010. In our study, all firms maintained the same fiscal calendar and there were active during the period of study. The results of our study indicate that there was a meaningful relationship between capital structure and firm value. In addition, there was a meaningful relationship between asset growth and increase on firm value. However, our study did not show any meaningful relationship between firms’ size as well as revenue growth and firms’ value.

This paper investigates the impact of corporate governance on firm value measured by Tobin’s Q. Different corporate governance proxies i.e. board size, board independence, audit committee and CEO duality are interacted with firm value. A sample of 91 nonfinancial firms listed on KSE was selected over the period 2010-2014. The findings of the study show that board size and CEO duality had negative impacts on firm value. Moreover, board size, non-executive directors and audit committee had positive and significant impacts on firm value.