Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Operational auditing versus traditional method: A comparative investigation

Journals

  • IJIEC (678)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (606)
  • CCL (460)
  • USCM (1087)
  • ESM (391)
  • AC (543)
  • JPM (215)
  • IJDS (802)
  • JFS (81)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)

Keywords

Supply chain management(156)
Jordan(154)
Vietnam(147)
Customer satisfaction(119)
Performance(108)
Supply chain(105)
Service quality(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(91)
SMEs(85)
Financial performance(81)
optimization(81)
Factor analysis(78)
Job satisfaction(78)
Trust(77)
Knowledge Management(76)
Genetic Algorithm(74)
TOPSIS(73)
Social media(72)
Organizational performance(71)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(52)
Endri Endri(44)
Muhammad Alshurideh(40)
Hotlan Siagian(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Jumadil Saputra(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Dmaithan Almajali(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Ahmad Makui(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Basrowi Basrowi(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(27)
Ali Harounabadi(26)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(26)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2149)
Indonesia(1208)
India(762)
Jordan(726)
Vietnam(489)
Malaysia(415)
Saudi Arabia(400)
United Arab Emirates(209)
Thailand(142)
China(130)
United States(100)
Turkey(97)
Ukraine(93)
Egypt(86)
Canada(83)
Pakistan(81)
Nigeria(72)
Peru(70)
United Kingdom(69)
Taiwan(65)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 6 pp. 1805-1814 , 2013

Operational auditing versus traditional method: A comparative investigation Pages 1805-1814 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Reza Tehrani, Amir Hasan Ghorbani

Keywords: Financial efficiency, Economic saving, Operational auditing

Abstract: Operational auditing is one of the management consultancy services whose significance is on the rise day by day. This approach is, clearly, a systematic and methodical process used to evaluate economic savings of financial processes in organizations and the results of the evaluations are reported to interested people along with some comments to improve operational processes. Accordingly, it appears that the proper employment of the existing rationale in operational auditing can be a significant step towards the improvement of financial efficiency in Iranian public and private banking sector. This paper studies the effects of operational auditing on the improvement of economic saving of financial processes in Iranian private banks compared with traditional approaches where the operations are based on financial statements. The population of this survey includes 15 private and public Iranian banks and the proposed study selects 78 branches, randomly. The Cronbach alpha was used to test the reliability a questionnaire employed to collect the needed data in this study. The results obtained by SPSS Software indicated that the reliability of the instruments\ranged between 0.752 and 0.867, suggesting an acceptable level of the reliability for the questionnaire. Besides, content validity was used to confirm the validity of the instrument. The results of the study indicated that the operational auditing as a useful approach influencing the financial efficiency of public and private banks has significantly transformed the traditional thinking in the field of management auditing. The operational auditing has a number of significant advantages including a better method of controlling financial operations within Iranian banks, efficient planning in the future, facilitating efficient, appropriate, and accurate management decision making, and sound evaluation of managers’ financial operations.

How to cite this paper
Tehrani, R & Ghorbani, A. (2013). Operational auditing versus traditional method: A comparative investigation.Management Science Letters , 3(6), 1805-1814.

Refrences
Azar, A., & Momeni, M. (2002). Statistics and its Applications in Management. Tehran University:
SAMT Publications (In Farsi).

Arbab Soleimani, A., & Nafari, M. (2003). Accounting Principles. Volume I (12th edition), Centre
for Community Research: Accounting and Auditing Organization (In Farsi).

Alvani, S.M. (2002). Public Management (17th edition). Tehran: Ghazal Press (In Farsi).

Operational Auditing Committee of the Audit Organization. (2001). An introduction to operational
auditing. Quarterly of Auditors, 3(10).

Report of Operational Auditing Committee of USA Certified Accountants’ Association Management.
(2006). Operational auditing: efficiency, effectiveness, economic saving.

Supreme Audit Court. (2008). Guidelines for the implementation of performance auditing standards.
1
st ed.

Supreme Audit Court. (2009). Performance auditing and its reporting framework. The Supreme Audit
Court: Technical and Auditing Deputy of Ministries and Public Institutions.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6 | Views: 1875 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Narcissism in Iranian auditing profession
  • The relationship between liquidity risk and credit risk in Islamic banking ...
  • A survey on different challenges confronting auditing system
  • The effects of performance criteria including accounting, market, and econo ...
  • The advantage of using operational budgeting on governmental organization

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com