A dynamic leader-follower model based on lack of central authority in emergency situations

Delkhosh, F.

Growing Science » International Journal of Data and Network Science » A dynamic leader-follower model based on lack of central authority in emergency situations

Journals

IJDS Volumes

Volume 1 (8)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (3)

Volume 2 (12)
- Issue 1 (3)
- Issue 2 (3)
- Issue 3 (3)
- Issue 4 (3)

Volume 3 (27)
- Issue 1 (4)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 4 (37)
- Issue 1 (6)
- Issue 2 (15)
- Issue 3 (7)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 5 (86)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (11)
- Issue 3 (32)
- Issue 4 (34)

Volume 6 (163)
- Issue 1 (30)
- Issue 2 (33)
- Issue 3 (40)
- Issue 4 (60)

Volume 7 (200)
- Issue 1 (53)
- Issue 2 (46)
- Issue 3 (46)
- Issue 4 (55)

Volume 8 (243)
- Issue 1 (60)
- Issue 2 (61)
- Issue 3 (60)
- Issue 4 (62)

Countries

International Journal of Data and Network Science

ISSN 2561-8156 (Online) - ISSN 2561-8148 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 4 Issue 1 pp. 73-90 , 2020

A dynamic leader-follower model based on lack of central authority in emergency situations Pages 73-90 Download PDF

Authors: Fatemeh Delkhosh

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.8.001

Keywords: Multi-level programing, Humanitarian logistics, Multi-objective optimization, Disaster management

Abstract: Most of the time, the government of the affected country cannot handle the entire relief operations. Under such conditions, international organizations act independently but are obliged to obey the law of the country. In this paper, we propose a dynamic multi-level programming where the affected country and international organizations dynamically change their roles, being leader or follower, according to a game. The application of the proposed model is investigated for a case problem where real data are utilized to design a network for humanitarian logistics during potential earthquakes. The advantages of using multi-level modeling against considering just one player's point of view are provided to guide decision-makers under a variety of conditions. The results show for the first three periods, the gov-ernment of the affected area cannot handle the demand for the rescue operation. Thus, the international suppliers act as the leader for the first three periods. However, by decreasing the demand for the rescue operation in the last three periods, the government can manage the evacuation operation properly.

How to cite this paper

 Delkhosh, F. (2020). A dynamic leader-follower model based on lack of central authority in emergency situations.International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(1), 73-90.

Refrences

Ahmadi, M., Seifi, A., & Tootooni, B. (2015). A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief oper-ation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco dis-trict. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 75, 145-163.
Aksen, D., Aras, N., & Piyade, N. (2013). A bilevel p-median model for the planning and protection of critical facilities. Journal of Heuristics, 19(2), 373-398.
Angelo, J. S., & Barbosa, H. J. (2015). A study on the use of heuristics to solve a bilevel programming problem. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(5), 861-882.
Arroyo, J. M., & Galiana, F. D. (2005). On the solution of the bilevel programming formulation of the terrorist threat problem. IEEE transactions on Power Systems, 20(2), 789-797.
Barbarosoğlu, G., Özdamar, L., & Cevik, A. (2002). An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 140(1), 118-133.
Camacho-Vallejo, J. F., González-Rodríguez, E., Almaguer, F. J., & González-Ramírez, R. G. (2015). A bi-level optimization model for aid distribution after the occurrence of a disaster. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 134-145.
Chapman, A. G., & Mitchell, J. E. (2018). A fair division approach to humanitarian logistics inspired by conditional value-at-risk. Annals of Operations Research, 262(1), 133-151.
Cozzolino, A. (2012). Humanitarian logistics: cross-sector cooperation in disaster relief management. Springer Science & Business Media.
Feng, C., & Wen, C. (2005). A bi-level programming model for allocating private and emergency ve-hicle flows in seismic disaster areas. In Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol 5 (Vol. 5, pp. 1408-1423).
Fereiduni, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2016). A robust optimization model for blood supply chain in emer-gency situations. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 7(4), 535-554.
Fereiduni, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2017). A robust optimization model for distribution and evacuation in the disaster response phase. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 13(1), 117-141.
Guha-Sapir, D., Vos, F., Below, R., & Ponserre, S. (2011). Annual disaster statistical review 2010. Cent. Res. Epidemiol. Disasters.
Gutjahr, W. J., & Dzubur, N. (2016). Bi-objective bilevel optimization of distribution center locations considering user equilibria. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re-view, 85, 1-22.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jaller, M., Van Wassenhove, L. N., Pérez, N., & Wachtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7-8), 494-506.
Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Seuring, S. (2014). Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: A robust model with real world application. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 70, 225-244.
Jahre, M., Persson, G., Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(2), 99–114.
John, L., & Ramesh, A. (2016). Modeling the barriers of humanitarian supply chain management in India. In Managing humanitarian logistics (pp. 61-82). Springer, New Delhi.
Knott, R. (1987). The logistics of bulk relief supplies. Disasters, 11(2), 113-115.
Knott, R. P. (1988). Vehicle scheduling for emergency relief management: A knowledge‐based ap-proach. Disasters, 12(4), 285-293.
Kress, M. (2016). Humanitarian Logistics. In Operational logistics (pp. 137-144). Springer, Cham.
Losada, C., Scaparra, M. P., Church, R. L., & Daskin, M. S. (2012). The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels. Annals of Operations Research, 201(1), 345-365.
Özdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Küçükyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disas-ters. Annals of operations research, 129(1-4), 217-245.
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Albores, P., & Brewster, C. (2018). Disaster preparedness in humanitarian logistics: A collaborative approach for resource management in floods. European Journal of Oper-ational Research, 264(3), 978-993.
Tatham, P., & Christopher, M. (Eds.). (2018). Humanitarian logistics: Meeting the challenge of pre-paring for and responding to disasters. Kogan Page Publishers.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational research Society, 57(5), 475-489.