The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint

Bani, E.; Jafari, D.

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint

Journals

DSL Volumes

Volume 1 (10)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (5)

Volume 2 (30)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (53)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 4 (48)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (12)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (12)

Volume 5 (39)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 6 (30)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 7 (41)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 8 (38)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 9 (39)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 10 (43)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (20)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 11 (49)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 12 (64)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (24)
- Issue 3 (13)
- Issue 4 (15)

Volume 13 (78)
- Issue 1 (21)
- Issue 2 (18)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (20)

Countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 5 Issue 2 pp. 211-218 , 2016

The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint Pages 211-218 Download PDF

Authors: Elnaz Bani, Davood Jafari

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.12.003

Keywords: Invasive weed optimization, Multi-objective decision making, Supplier selection

Abstract: This paper presents a mathematical model to solve a multi-objective decision making supplier selection problem. The proposed problem considers three objective functions: the first objective function minimizes the cost of purchasing the products while the second objective function minimizes the due dates and finally the third objective function maximizes the customer satisfaction. The resulted problem is formulated as mixed integer programming and, therefore, we use invasive weed optimization technique to solve the resulted problem. The performance of the proposed model is compared with NSGA II based on different criteria such as mean ideal distance and quality matrix. The preliminary results indicate that the proposed model performs relatively well compared with alternative method.

How to cite this paper

 Bani, E & Jafari, D. (2016). The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint.Decision Science Letters , 5(2), 211-218.

Refrences

Basak, A., Pal, S., Das, S., Abraham, A., & Snasel, V. (2010, July). A modified invasive weed optimization algorithm for time-modulated linear antenna array synthesis. In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2010 IEEE Congress on (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T. (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: proceedings of the parallel problem solving from nature VI (PPSN-VI) conference, 849-858.

Ghodsypour, S. H., & O & apos; Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International journal of production economics, 56, 199-212.

Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’brien, C. (2001). The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. International Journal of Production Economics, 73(1), 15-27.

Golmohammadi, D., Creese, R. C., & Valian, H. (2009). Neural network application for supplier selection. International Journal of Product Development, 8(3), 252-275.

Mehrabian, A. R., & Lucas, C. (2006). A novel numerical optimization algorithm inspired from weed colonization. Ecological informatics, 1(4), 355-366.

Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mahapatra, S. K. (2006). Multiproduct, multicriteria model for supplier selection with product life?cycle considerations. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 577-603.

Nikokalam-Mozafar, S. H., Ashjari, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Omidvar, A. (2014). Solving a multi-objective chance-constrained hub covering location problem by discrete invasive weed optimization. Cogent Engineering, 1(1), 991526.

Oliver, R. K., & Webber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy. Outlook, 5(1), 42-47.

Ozkok, B. A., & Tiryaki, F. (2011). A compensatory fuzzy approach to multi-objective linear supplier selection problem with multiple-item. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11363-11368.

Ng, W. L. (2008). An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(3), 1059-1067.

Parhizkari, M., Amiri, M., & Mousakhani, M. (2013). A multiple criteria decision making technique for supplier selection and inventory management strategy: A case of multi-product and multi-supplier problem. Decision Science Letters, 2(3), 185-190.

Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? (pp. 109-121). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Sedehzadeh, S., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Mohammadi, M., & Jolai, F. (2014). Solving a new priority M/M/C Queue model for a multi-mode hub covering location problem by multi-objective parallel simulated annealing. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics studies and Research, 48(4), 299-318.

Senvar, O., Tuzkaya, G., & Kahraman, C. (2014). Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy PROMETHEE method. In Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness (pp. 21-34). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Shahroudi, K., & Rouydel, H. (2012). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach (ANP-TOPSIS) to evaluate suppliers in Iran’s auto industry.International Journal of Applied Operational Research, 2(2), 37-48.

Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2003). Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max–min approach. European Journal of Operational Research,146(3), 543-552.

Ting, S. C., & Cho, D. I. (2008). An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 116-127.

Vander Wiele, A., Williams, A. R. T., Brown, A., & Dale, B. G. (2001). The ISO 9000 series as a tool for organisational change: is there a case?.Business Process Management Journal, 7(4), 323-331.

Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18.