An effort allocation model considering different budgetary constraint on fault detection process and fault correction process

Kumar, V.; Sahni, R.

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » An effort allocation model considering different budgetary constraint on fault detection process and fault correction process

Journals

DSL Volumes

Volume 1 (10)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (5)

Volume 2 (30)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (53)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 4 (48)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (12)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (12)

Volume 5 (39)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 6 (30)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 7 (41)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 8 (38)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 9 (39)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 10 (43)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (20)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 11 (49)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (17)

Volume 12 (64)
- Issue 1 (12)
- Issue 2 (24)
- Issue 3 (13)
- Issue 4 (15)

Volume 13 (78)
- Issue 1 (21)
- Issue 2 (18)
- Issue 3 (19)
- Issue 4 (20)

Countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 5 Issue 1 pp. 143-156 , 2016

An effort allocation model considering different budgetary constraint on fault detection process and fault correction process Pages 143-156 Download PDF

Authors: Vijay Kumar, Ramita Sahni

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.7.002

Keywords: Fault correction process, Fault detection process, Optimal control theory, Release policy, Resource allocation

Abstract: Fault detection process (FDP) and Fault correction process (FCP) are important phases of software development life cycle (SDLC). It is essential for software to undergo a testing phase, during which faults are detected and corrected. The main goal of this article is to allocate the testing resources in an optimal manner to minimize the cost during testing phase using FDP and FCP under dynamic environment. In this paper, we first assume there is a time lag between fault detection and fault correction. Thus, removal of a fault is performed after a fault is detected. In addition, detection process and correction process are taken to be independent simultaneous activities with different budgetary constraints. A structured optimal policy based on optimal control theory is proposed for software managers to optimize the allocation of the limited resources with the reliability criteria. Furthermore, release policy for the proposed model is also discussed. Numerical example is given in support of the theoretical results.

How to cite this paper

 Kumar, V & Sahni, R. (2016). An effort allocation model considering different budgetary constraint on fault detection process and fault correction process.Decision Science Letters , 5(1), 143-156.

Refrences

Chang, Y. C. (2004). A sequential software release policy. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 56(1), 193-204.

Goel, A. L., & Okumoto, K. (1979). Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 28(3), 206-211.

Gokhale, S. S., Wong, W. E., Trivedi, K. S., & Horgan, J. R. (1998, September). An analytical approach to architecture-based software reliability prediction. In Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium, 1998. IPDS & apos; 98. Proceedings. IEEE International (pp. 13-22). IEEE.

Huang, C. Y., Kuo, S. Y., & Chen, Y. (1997, November). Analysis of a software reliability growth model with logistic testing-effort function. In Software Reliability Engineering, 1997. Proceedings., The Eighth International Symposium on (pp. 378-388). IEEE.

Huang, Y., Lo, J.-H., Kuo, S.-Y. and Lyu, M.R. (2004). Optimal allocation of testing resources considering cost, reliability, and testing-effort, In the Proc. Pacific-Rim Dependable Computing, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia, pp.103-112.

Huang, C.-Y. (2005). Cost-reliability-optimal Release Policy for Software Reliability Models Incorporating Improvements in Testing Efficiency, Journal of Systems and Software, 77, 139–155.

Huang, C. Y., & Lin, C. T. (2006). Software reliability analysis by considering fault dependency and debugging time lag. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 55(3), 436-450.

Huang, C. Y., Kuo, S. Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2007). An assessment of testing-effort dependent software reliability growth models. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 56(2), 198-211.

Hwang, S., & Pham, H. (2009). Quasi-renewal time-delay fault-removal consideration in software reliability modeling. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 39(1), 200-209.

Inoue, S., & Yamada, S. (2007). Generalized discrete software reliability modeling with effect of program size. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 37(2), 170-179.

Lixin, J. I. A., Bo, Y. A. N. G., Suchang, G. U. O., & Park, D. H. (2010). Software reliability modeling considering fault correction process. IEICE transactions on information and systems, 93(1), 185-188.

Kapur, P. K., Gupta, A., Shatnawi, O., & Yadavalli, V. S. S. (2006). Testing effort control using flexible software reliability growth model with change point. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 2(3), 245-262.

Kapur, P. K., Bardhan, A. K., & Yadavalli, V. S. S. (2007). On allocation of resources during testing phase of a modular software. International Journal of Systems Science, 38(6), 493-499.

Kapur, P. K., Chanda, U., & Kumar, V. (2010). Optimal allocation of testing effort: A control theoretic approach. In Proc. National Conf. Computing for Nation Development; INDIACOM-2010 (pp. 425-430).

Kapur, P. K., Pham, H., Kumar, V., & Anand, A. (2012). Dynamic optimal control model for profit maximization of software product under the influence of promotional effort. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,23(2), 122-129.

Kapur, P. K., Pham, H., Chanda, U., & Kumar, V. (2013). Optimal allocation of testing effort during testing and debugging phases: a control theoretic approach. International Journal of Systems Science, 44(9), 1639-1650.

Kumar, V., Khatri, S. K., Dua, H., Sharma, M., & Mathur, P. (2014). An assessment of testing cost with effort dependent FDP and FCP under learning effect: A Genetic Algorithm Approach; International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 21(6), 1450027.

Li, H., Zeng, M., Lu, M., Hu, X., & Li, Z. (2012). Adaboosting?based dynamic weighted combination of software reliability growth models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(1), 67-84.

Ohba, M. (1984). Software reliability analysis models. IBM Journal of research and Development, 28(4), 428-443.

Pegels, C. C. (1969). On startup or learning curves: An expanded view. AIIE Transactions, 1(3), 216-222.

Peng, R., Li, Y. F., Zhang, W. J., & Hu, Q. P. (2014). Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 126, 37-43.

Pillai, K., & Sukumaran Nair, V. S. (1997). A model for software development effort and cost estimation. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 23(8), 485-497.

Schneidewind, N. F. (1975, April). Analysis of error processes in computer software. In ACM Sigplan Notices (Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 337-346). ACM.

Schneidewind, N. F. (2003, November). Fault correction profiles. In Software Reliability Engineering, 2003. ISSRE 2003. 14th International Symposium on(pp. 257-267). IEEE.

Sethi, S.P., & Thompson, G.L. (2005). Optimal Control Theory — Applications to Management Science and Economics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).

Su, Y. S., & Huang, C. Y. (2007). Neural-network-based approaches for software reliability estimation using dynamic weighted combinational models. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 606-615.

Wu, Y. P., Hu, Q. P., Xie, M., & Ng, S. H. (2007). Modeling and analysis of software fault detection and correction process by considering time dependency. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 56(4), 629-642.

Xie, M., & Zhao, M. (1992, October). The Schneidewind software reliability model revisited. In Software Reliability Engineering, 1992. Proceedings., Third International Symposium on (pp. 184-192). IEEE.

Xie, M., Hu, Q. P., Wu, Y. P., & Ng, S. H. (2007). A study of the modeling and analysis of software fault?detection and fault?correction processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(4), 459-470.

Yamada, S., Ohba, M., & Osaki, S. (1983). S-shaped reliability growth modeling for software error detection. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 32(5), 475-484.